Phenomenology, Geometry and Vision: Merleau-Ponty'S Critique of Classical Theories of Vision

Avebury (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this book is to establish that Merleau Ponty's objections to classical theories of perception, as represented by Descartes and Berkely, are valid and to lend further support to these objections by providing an analysis of the theories themselves using Merleau Ponty's objections as a framework. In so far as the book focuses on Merleau Ponty, it does so by extracting from his phenomenological critique, a series of arguments which, it is contested, succeed in casting serious doubt on the soundness of classical theories of perception. The book is primarily intended to introduce analytic philosophers to phenomenology as an analytical and critical tool in the understanding of perception. The main conclusion of the book is that classical theories of perception cannot account for the phenomenon of perception.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The madness of sight.Emmanuel Alloa - 2007 - In Karin Leonhard & Silke Horstkotte (eds.), Seeing Perception. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 40-59. pp. 40--59.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-07

Downloads
3 (#1,694,438)

6 months
1 (#1,506,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Skillful action in peripersonal space.Gabrielle Benette Jackson - 2014 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (2):313-334.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references