On Rejecting the Theory of Common Ancestry: A Reply to Hasker

Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 44:258-63 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Trinities: Reply to Hasker.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):441 - 447.
Essentialism, history, and biological taxa.Makmiller Pedroso - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):182-190.
Common ancestry and natural selection.Elliott Sober & Steven Hecht Orzack - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (3):423-437.
Reply to Hasker: Does the B-Theory of Time Imply Fatalism?Gregory E. Ganssle - 1995 - International Philosophical Quarterly 35 (2):217-218.
Reply to Basinger on Power Entailment.William Hasker - 1988 - Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):87-90.
Evolution and Alvin Plantinga.William Hasker - 1992 - Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 44 (3):150-162.
The problem of natural evil II: Hybrid replies.Luke Gelinas - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):560-574.
Gladness, regret, God, and evil a reply to Hasker.Wesley Morriston - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):401-407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-30

Downloads
36 (#441,072)

6 months
1 (#1,461,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alvin Plantinga
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references