On the So Called Psychological Law of Non-Contradiction

Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 25:57-61 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The three definitions of the law of non-contradiction highlighted by Jan Łukasiewicz in Aristotle’s Metaphysics included, aside from its ontological and logical versions, also the psychological one. Commentators have not reached a consensus as to its precise character. Below I shall present the existing discrepancies and propose a solution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-10

Downloads
8 (#1,344,496)

6 months
2 (#1,259,626)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1989 - In Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press. pp. 22-40.
Radical Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Dialectica 27 (3-4):313-328.
Mythologies.Roland Barthes & Annette Lavers - 1973 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (4):563-564.

View all 12 references / Add more references