The Coevolution of Secrecy and Stigmatization

Human Nature 21 (3):290-308 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We propose a coevolutionary model of secrecy and stigmatization. According to this model, secrecy functions to conceal potential fitness costs detected in oneself or one’s genetic kin. In three studies, we found that the content of participants’ distressing secrets overlapped significantly with three domains of social information that were important for inclusive fitness and served as cues for discriminating between rewarding and unrewarding interaction partners: health, mating, and social-exchange behavior. These findings support the notion that secrecy functions primarily as a defense against stigmatization by suppressing information about oneself or one’s kin that evolutionarily has been devalued in mating and social exchange

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conjectures on the dynamics of secrecy and the secrets business.Mark N. Wexler - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6):469 - 480.
Managerial secrecy: An ethical examination. [REVIEW]Victor Pompa - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):147 - 156.
Secrets: on the ethics of concealment and revelation.Sissela Bok - 1982 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Nuclear waste, secrecy and the mass media.Len Ackland, Karen Dorn Steele & JoAnn M. Valenti - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):181-190.
Review essay/the ethics of secrecy.Bernard Gert - 1985 - Criminal Justice Ethics 4 (1):78-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
15 (#923,100)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?