The Inverse Relationship between Secrecy and Privacy
Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (2):883-898 (2010)
AbstractIn civil libertarian discourse, the inverse relationship between government secrecy and privacy is well recognized and widely acknowledged - so widely, in fact, that it can come to seem as though we might regain sufficient privacy simply by cabining official secrecy. But regimes of secrecy that insulate private-sector data processing practices also contribute materially to the decline of privacy, and indeed play a vital role in facilitating government efforts to make citizens' lives transparent. In addition, there is an inverse relationship between openness and privacy that we are inclined to resist discussing. When, for example, a government agency posts on its website documents containing private information about individual citizens, or when a social networking service establishes default rules for transmitting information from member pages to commercial partners, openness contributes materially to the exposure that people experience. Our public discourse about information policy reinforces the devaluation of privacy in two opposite but mutually-reinforcing ways, by valorizing political economies organized around secrecy and by elevating openness as an ultimate good. The shelter that privacy affords for self-development is essential to a healthy democracy. It is therefore important to interrogate both our regimes of secrecy and our discourses about openness.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Inverse Relationship Between Secrecy and Privacy.Julie E. Cohen - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (3):883-898.
Privacy, Secrecy, Fact, and Falsehood.Pierre Le Morvan - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Research 40:313-336.
The Social Dynamics of Secrecy: Rethinking Information and Privacy Through Georg Simmel.Sami Coll - 2012 - International Review of Information Ethics 17:07.
Secreto, lenguaje y memoria en la sociedad de la información.Rafael Capurro & Raquel Capurro - 2012 - International Review of Information Ethics 17:3-14.
Openness Versus Secrecy? Historical and Historiographical Remarks.Koen Vermeir - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Science 45 (2):165-188.
New Ways of Thinking About Privacy.B. Roessler - 2006 - In Anne Philips Bonnie Honig & John Dryzek (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 694-713.
National Security Secrecy: How the Limits Change.Steven Aftergood - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (2):839-852.
National Security Secrecy: How the Limits Change.Steven Aftergood - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (3):839-852.
Boundary Politics in the Public Sphere: Openness, Secrecy, and Leak.Agnes S. Ku - 1998 - Sociological Theory 16 (2):172-192.
Privacy, Secrecy and Security.Paul B. Thompson - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (1):13-19.