Replies to Crisp, Shaver and Skelton

Revue D’Études Benthamiennes 12 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is a great privilege to have one’s work critiqued by such a distinguished trio of philosophers and Sidgwick scholars. I owe further debts to Anthony and Rob, who were the OUP referees for my book. As will have been quite evident from the preceding discussion, they would not want to be held responsible for the book’s detailed contents, on which they gave me much excellent commentary. But, in thanking them here, I do want to say in particular that it seems to me the published version is much..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review of David Phillips, Sidgwickian Ethics[REVIEW]Anthony Skelton - 2015 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 12 (6):794-797.
Replies to Stroud, Thomson, and Crisp.Richard Kraut - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (2):483-501.
Utilitarianism and Egoism in Sidgwickian Ethics.Robert Shaver - 2013 - Revue D’Études Benthamiennes 12.
Reply to Crisp.Michael Otsuka & Alex Voorhoeve - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (1):109-114.
Crisp's ‘ethics without reasons?’: A note on invariance.Edward Harcourt - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):50-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
39 (#401,270)

6 months
10 (#255,790)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Phillips
University of Houston

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Sidgwick's Philosophical Intuitions.Anthony Skelton - 2008 - Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 10 (2):185-209.

Add more references