- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reworking Sandel's republicanism
Journal of Philosophy 95 (2):73-96 (1998)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review: Reworking Sandel's Republicanism. [REVIEW]Philip Pettit - 1998 - Journal of Philosophy 95 (2):73 - 96.
From Communitarianism to Republicanism. [REVIEW]Hilliard Aronovitch - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (4):621-647.
Liberalism, Republicanism And The Spirit Of American Politics: A Critique Of Sandel.David Peddle - 1997 - Animus 2:166-188.
On republicanism and liberalism.Michael Sandel - 2002 - In S. Phineas Upham & Joshua Harlan (eds.), Philosophers in Conversation: Interviews From the Harvard Review of Philosophy. Routledge.
From Communitarianism to Republicanism. [REVIEW]Hilliard Aronovitch - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (4):621-647.
America's contents and discontents: Reflections on Michael Sandel's America.Rogers M. Smith - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):73-96.
Does Rawls Support the Procedural Republic? A Procedural Republic? A Critical Response to Critical Response to Sandel's Democracy's Discontent.Colin Farrelly - unknown
Against reviving republicanism.Geoffrey Brennan & Loren Lomasky - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):221-252.
Humanism and antihumanism in lasch and sandel.Tom Hoffman - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):97-114.
Republicanism as a Paradigm for Public Health--Some Comments.M. E. J. Nielsen - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (1):40-52.
Pettit's civic republicanism and male domination.Marilyn Friedman - 2008 - In Cécile Laborde & John W. Maynor (eds.), Republicanism and Political Theory. Blackwell.
O debate dos desencontros: uma avaliação das críticas de Michal Sandel ao liberalismo de John Rawls.Flávio Azevedo Reis - 2013 - Doispontos 10 (1).
In the shadow of Lucretius: The epicurean foundations of Machiavelli's political thought.Paul Rahe - 2007 - History of Political Thought 28 (1):30-55.
Human Enhancement and the Giftedness of Life.Michael Hauskeller - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (1):55-79.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-23
Downloads
360 (#55,579)
6 months
60 (#78,961)
2014-03-23
Downloads
360 (#55,579)
6 months
60 (#78,961)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Eliminating Terms of Confusion: Resolving the Liberal–Republican Dispute.Lars J. K. Moen - 2022 - The Journal of Ethics 26 (2):247–271.
A Critique of Philip Pettit's Republicanism.Charles Larmore - 2001 - Philosophical Issues 11 (1):229-243.
Rawls on pluralism and stability.Robert B. Talisse - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):173-194.
Are rights less important for republicans than for liberals? Pettit versus Pettit.Christopher Hamel - 2017 - Contemporary Political Theory 16 (4):478-500.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-2bmv2 uwo