Right to be Wrong: If Brain is Guilty, are We Responsible?

Open Ethics Journal 2:40-43 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Right to be Wrong: If Brain is Guilty, are We Responsible?~!2008-09-09~!2008-10-28~!2008-12-04~!Dragan Pavlovic - 2008 - Open Ethics Journal 2 (1):40-43.
When a Person Feels that She Is Guilty and Believes that She Is Not Guilty.Juha Räikkä - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:149-152.
Some Theses on Desert.Randolph Clarke - 2013 - Philosophical Explorations 16 (2):153-64.
Guilty Mind or Guilty Brain? Criminal Responsibility in the Age of Neuroscience.David Hodgson - unknown
Neuroscience, Ethics and Legal Responsibility: The Problem of the Insanity Defense: Commentary on “The Ethics of Neuroscience and the Neuroscience of Ethics: A Phenomenological–Existential Approach”.Steven R. Smith - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):475-481.
The right way, the wrong way, and the army way: A dendritic parable.Arnold B. Scheibel - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):575-575.
Devil’s Advocates: On the Ethics of Unjust Legal Advocacy.Michael Huemer - manuscript
Right answer to the wrong question: A reply to Jung and haier.Robert J. Sternberg - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (2):170-171.
Making our own luck.David Hodgson - 2007 - Ratio 20 (3):278–292.
Doing the best one can and the principle of alternative possibilities.Ishtiyaque Haji - 1994 - Southwest Philosophy Review 10 (2):113-127.
Two faces of desert.Matt King - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (3):401-424.
Just warfare theory and noncombatant immunity.Richard Arneson - manuscript
ECT — verdict: Not guilty.Max Fink - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):26-27.
Person as Lawyer: How Having a Guilty Mind Explains Attributions of Intentional Agency.Frank Hindriks - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):339-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-07

Downloads
9 (#1,236,107)

6 months
1 (#1,498,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references