The Book that Never was: Montesquieu's Considerations on the Romans in Historical Context

History of Political Thought 26 (1):43-89 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the face of it, Montesquieu's Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and their Decline would appear to be a work of erudition and a philosophical history, and as such it has generally been read. It was never, however, intended to stand alone. It was composed as part of a larger, polemical work, akin in purpose to the Philosophical Letters of Voltaire, and it should be read in light of the other components of that work - Montesquieu's Reflections on Universal Monarchy in Europe and his Constitution of England. Had Montesquieu not been forced by fear of the censor to suppress the book he at first intended to publish, we would not now have difficulty in recognizing his little tract on the Romans as a meditation on the significance of the Duke of Marlborough's victories over Louis XIV in the War of the Spanish Succession

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Montesquieu's anti-Machiavellian Machiavellianism.Paul A. Rahe - 2011 - History of European Ideas 37 (2):128-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
23 (#677,046)

6 months
2 (#1,192,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Anthony Rahe
Hillsdale College

Citations of this work

Montesquieu's natural rights constitutionalism.Paul A. Rahe - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):51-81.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references