Fair’s Fair: How Public Benefit Considerations in the Fair Use Doctrine Can Patch Bias in Artificial Intelligence Systems

Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality 11 (2):229-243 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) expands relentlessly despite well-documented examples of bias in AI systems, from facial recognition failing to differentiate between darker-skinned faces to hiring tools discriminating against female candidates. These biases can be introduced to AI systems in a variety of ways; however, a major source of bias is found in training datasets, the collection of images, text, audio, or information used to build and train AI systems. This Article first grapples with the pressure copyright law exerts on AI developers and researchers to use biased training data to build algorithms, focusing on the potential risk of copyright infringement. Second, it examines how the fair use doctrine, particularly its public benefit consideration, can be applied to AI systems and begin to address the algorithmic bias problem afflicting many of today’s systems. Ultimately, the Article concludes that the social utility and human rights benefits of diversifying AI training data justifies the fair use of copyrighted works.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Private use as fair use: is it fair?F. S. Grodzinsky & M. C. Bottis - 2007 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 37 (2):11-24.
The university and the moral imperative of fair trade coffee.Gavin Fridell - 2004 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):141-159.
Fair Subject Selection in Clinical and Social Scientific Research.Douglas MacKay - 2020 - In Ana S. Iltis & Douglas MacKay (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Research Ethics. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Fair Trade: An Imperfect Obligation?Nicole Hassoun - 2017 - Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (2).
Fair Trade: An Imperfect Obligation?Nicole Hassoun - 2018 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (2).
What is Fair and Equitable Benefit-sharing?Bram De Jonge - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):127-146.
What is Fair and Equitable Benefit-sharing?Bram Jonge - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):127-146.
Fairness and Fair Shares.Keith Horton - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (1):88-93.
Free Riders,'Fair Share,'and the Principle of Fair Play.Scott C. Lowe - 1996 - Public Affairs Quarterly 10 (1):49-62.
The Role of Personal Values in Fair Trade Consumption.Caroline Josephine Doran - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (4):549-563.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-27

Downloads
1 (#1,905,656)

6 months
1 (#1,478,912)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references