Ethics and US Af-Pak Policy

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):31-46 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Just war thinking applies to the conflict Afghanistan, particularly that underdeveloped part of the just war tradition that deals with war’s end and post-conflict (jus post bellum). This essay considers the some of the fundamental ethical challenges of the ongoing conflict in Afghanistan and neighboring Pakistan, arguing that by considering a jus post bellum framework of Order, Justice, and Conciliation we can address some of the great ethical issues faced by the US government in Afghanistan today. More specifically, this essay will focus on three ethical challenges:• The moral imperative of establishing and enduring political order.• The conflict between our ideals of justice and those of many Afghans.• Establishing a foundation for conciliation among warring parties.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

After war ends: a philosophical perspective.Larry May - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant's ethics of war and peace.Brian Orend - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Skepticism about Jus Post Bellum.Seth Lazar - 2012 - In Larry May & Andrew Forcehimes (eds.), Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-222.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
War and intention.Darrell Cole - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):174-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
21 (#733,267)

6 months
9 (#300,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references