Quantum assembly semantics: The fallacious lingo of occupation numbers [Book Review]

Foundations of Physics 21 (1):83-92 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The usual heuristic description of quantum mechanical assemblies features so-called “occupation numbers” interpreted quite literally. This essay critically compares that point of view with a more rigorous understanding of composite systems based upon a principal lesson of Einstein's paradox and Bell's inequality, viz., that it is fallacious to regard a subsystem as possessing or “occupying” any state whatever

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

About a Generalization of Bell's Inequality.V. M. González-Robles - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (5):839-853.
The empirical determination of quantum states.William Band & James L. Park - 1970 - Foundations of Physics 1 (2):133-144.
Quantum Discreteness is an Illusion.H. Dieter Zeh - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1476-1493.
Transfer Principle in Quantum Set Theory.Masanao Ozawa - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (2):625 - 648.
Occupy Liberalism!Charles W. Mills - 2012 - Radical Philosophy Review 15 (2):305-323.
Philosophen in der mikrowelt — ratlos?Manfred Stöckler - 1986 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):68-95.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
54 (#294,559)

6 months
12 (#210,071)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references