Journal of Business Ethics 102 (1):15-28 (2011)

Of the many ethical corporate marketing practices, many firms use corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication to enhance their corporate image. Yet, consumers, overwhelmed by these more or less well-founded CSR claims, often have trouble identifying truly responsible firms. This confusion encourages ‘greenwashing’ and may make CSR initiatives less effective. On the basis of attribution theory, this study investigates the role of independent sustainability ratings on consumers’ responses to companies’ CSR communication. Experimental results indicate the negative effect of a poor sustainability rating for corporate brand evaluations in the case of CSR communication, because consumers infer less intrinsic motives by the brand. Sustainability ratings thus could act to deter ‘greenwashing’ and encourage virtuous firms to persevere in their CSR practices
Keywords Ethical corporate marketing  CSR communication  Attribution theory  Sustainability ratings
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,464
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 42 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The CSR Halo: Evidence From Long-Term CSR Practices in Large Corporations.Terry B. Porter & Patti C. Miles - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:287-299.


Added to PP index

Total views
124 ( #95,665 of 2,520,783 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,225 of 2,520,783 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes