Introducció. El debat entre W. K. Clifford i William James

Quaderns de Filosofia i Ciència (2):123-127 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I comment on the debate between W. K. Clifford ("The Ethics of Belief", 1877) and William James ("The Will to Believe", 1896). I argue that both authors assume doxastic voluntarism -i.e., the claim that we can, at least in some occasions, willingly decide what to believe- and I argue that doxastic voluntarism is unacceptable.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-12

Downloads
344 (#7,144)

6 months
75 (#214,440)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alberto Oya
Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Deciding to believe.Bernard Williams - 1973 - In Problems of the Self. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 136--51.

Add more references