Reflecting on the ‘Patient record access proposals’ in the UK Government’s planned NHS–Life Sciences partnership

Research Ethics 8 (3):169-177 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I review the principal arguments in favour of and against the UK government’s recent proposals to allow access to NHS patient records to life sciences companies as part of the NHS–Life Sciences partnership scheme.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The value history: A necessary family document.Renate G. Justin - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
The voices of the medical record.Suzanne Poirier & Daniel J. Brauner - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (1).
Is there a right to health?Timothy Goodman - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (6):643 – 662.
The trauma triangle.Jurrit Bergsma - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (4).
Patients' duties.Michael J. Meyer - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):541-555.
Aboriginal church paintings: Reflecting on our faith [Book Review].Carmel Pilcher - 2011 - The Australasian Catholic Record 88 (3):382.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
22 (#708,419)

6 months
2 (#1,196,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Scientific research is a moral duty.J. Harris - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):242-248.
How not to criticize the precautionary principle.Jonathan Hughes - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):447 – 464.

Add more references