Amphibians and the Particular-Universal Distinction

Australasian Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend a new conception of the particular-universal distinction based on considerations about what David Lewis calls ‘amphibians’. I argue, first, that given the possibility of amphibians, two recently popular conceptions of the particular-universal distinction, namely the repeatability conception and the duplicability conception, are both objectionable since they are biased in one way or another. I then propose a more flexible conception that solves this problem by regarding amphibians as belonging to a sui generis sort of property distinct from what I call ‘strong universals’ and ‘strong tropes’. Finally, I respond to some objections directed at this new account.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Where are particulars and universals?Fraser MacBride - 1998 - Dialectica 52 (3):203–227.
Ramsey on universals.Fraser MacBride - 2005 - In Hallvard Lillehammer & David Hugh Mellor (eds.), Ramsey's Legacy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 83-104.
The Physical Basis of Predication.Andrew Newman - 1992 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Indiscernible universals.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (6):604-624.
The Concept of the Universal in Some Later Pre‐Platonic Cosmologists.Alexander P. D. Mourelatos - 2018 - In Sean D. Kirkland & Eric Sanday (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. pp. 56–76.
How Does Aristotle Understand the Paradox of the Meno?Nathan Elvidge - 2023 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 17 (1):80-95.
Scotus’ Nature: From Universal to Trope.Hamid Taieb - 2017 - In Fabrizio Amerini & Laurent Cesalli (eds.), Universals in the Fourteenth Century. Pise, Italie: pp. 89-108.
Indiscernible Universals.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2020 - Humanities Journal of Valparaiso 16:89-110.
Indiscernible Universals.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2020 - Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 16:89-110.
Three trope theories.Paweł Rojek - 2008 - Axiomathes 18 (3):359-377.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-09

Downloads
84 (#198,077)

6 months
53 (#83,108)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chiao-Li Ou
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
From an ontological point of view.John Heil - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references