Particulars, modes and universals: An examination of E.j. Lowe's four-fold ontology

Dialectica 58 (3):317–333 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is there a particular‐universal distinction? Ramsey famously advocated scepticism about this distinction. In “Some Formal Ontological Relations” E.J. Lowe argues against Ramsey that a particular‐universal distinction can be made out after all if only we allow ourselves the resources to distinguish between the elements of a four‐fold ontology. But in defence of Ramsey I argue that the case remains to be made in favour of either the four‐fold ontology Lowe recommends or the articulation of a particular‐universal distinction within it. I also argue that the case remains to be made against a spatio‐temporal conception of the particular‐universal distinction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#215,512)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fraser MacBride
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

Amphibians and the Particular-Universal Distinction.Chiao-Li Ou - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
A survey of metaphysics.E. Jonathan Lowe - 2002 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle: The Desire to Understand.Jonathan Lear - 1988 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references