Remarks on McCormick’s Comments

Philosophia 37 (3):475-476 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is my reply to Miriam McCormick’s comments on my paper, ‘What Can Causal Claims Mean?’, delivered at the Meaning and Modern Empiricism conference.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume, Wittgenstein and the Impact of Skepticism.Miriam McCormick - 2004 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (4):417-434.
Richard McCormick and Proportionate Reason.Sanford S. Levy - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):258 - 278.
Remarks on Grandi’s Comments.Daniel E. Flage - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):379-380.
On McCormick and Teleological Morality.Frederick S. Carney - 1978 - Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):81 - 107.
Why Should We Be Wise?Miriam McCormick - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (1):3-19.
Compelled Belief.Miriam McCormick - 2005 - American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):157-169.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-02

Downloads
51 (#310,975)

6 months
8 (#353,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Walter Ott
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references