Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):81 - 107 (1978)
Abstract |
This essay, after setting forth four different types of teleology employed in various moralities (a teleology of persons, of nature, of human institutions, and of moral obligation) and identifying the teleology advocated by McCormick as an instance of the fourth type, critically examines an assumption by McCormick that an acknowledgement of teleology of any of the first three types is equivalent to, or leads to the affirmation of, a teleology of the fourth type. Then it explores the relation of McCormick's teleology of moral obligation to utilitarianism and to the classic Catholic morality of Thomas Aquinas, finding an identity with the former and a discontinuity with the latter. Finally, this essay suggests some considerations against adopting the teleological morality advocated by McCormick.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Inexplicability of Kant’s Naturzweck: Kant on Teleology, Explanation and Biology.James Kreines - 2005 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (3):270-311.
Richard McCormick and Proportionate Reason.Sanford S. Levy - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):258 - 278.
Darwin's Language May Seem Teleological, but His Thinking is Another Matter.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1994 - Biology and Philosophy 9 (4):489-492.
Leibniz on Teleology and the Intelligibility of Nature.James D. Madden - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:173-188.
Kant's Biological Teleology and Its Philosophical Significance.Hannah Ginsborg - 2006 - In A Companion to Kant. Blackwell.
Human Rights and Modernity: The Truth of the Fiction of Individual Rights.Jon P. Gunnemann - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1):160 - 189.
Aquinas and Modern Contractualism.Don Adams - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (4):509 – 530.
Duty, Nature, Right: Kant's Response to Mendelssohn in Theory and Practice III.Katrin Flikschuh - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):223-241.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-05-29
Total views
6 ( #1,137,335 of 2,518,714 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,822 of 2,518,714 )
2011-05-29
Total views
6 ( #1,137,335 of 2,518,714 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,822 of 2,518,714 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads