Is Theism a Simple, and hence Probable, Explanation for the Universe?

South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):354-368 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Richard Swinburne, in his The Existence of God (2004), presents a cosmological argument in defence of theism (Swinburne 1991: 119, 135). God, Swinburne argues, is more likely to bring about an ordered universe than other states (ibid.: 144, 299). To defend this view, Swinburne presents the following arguments: (1) That this ordered universe is a priori improbable (2004: 49, 150, 1991: 304 et seq.), given the stringent requirements for life (cf. also Leslie 2000: 12), and the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Giancoli 1990: 396); (2) That it seems as if this ordered universe can be explained by theism; (3) A theistic explanation for the universe is more probable because it is a simple explanation. To this end, Swinburne makes use of Bayes’ Theorem. Symbolically, this claim can be represented as (e) for the evidence of the existence of a complex universe, and (h) for a hypothesis. Swinburne’s argument is that theism has a higher prior probability, P(htheism) > P(hmaterialism), since theism is simpler than materialism. He concludes that P(e|htheism) > P(e|hmaterialism). In this paper I will address only this argument (3) above, and defend the view that it is false: theism is not simpler than materialism, nor it is more probably true. I conclude that theism is less probable than materialism, expressed by P(htheism) < P(hmaterialism) : 2/N(2n+1) < 1/n, where N is the number of possible universes and n the number of entities in existence



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Swinburne's explanation of the universe. [REVIEW]Quentin Smith - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (1):91-102.
Prior probabilities in the argument from fine-tuning.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):641 - 653.
Second reply to grünbaum.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):919-925.
The Existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Theism and physical cosmology.Hans Halvorson - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro, Victoria Harrison & Stewart Goetz (eds.), Routledge Companion to Theism.
Swinburne on the Simplicity of Theism.Bruce Langtry - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):409 - 426.
Simplicity and Theology.Don Fawkes & Tom Smythe - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):259 - 270.
Many Kinds of Rational Theistic Belief.Richard Swinburne - 1999 - In G. Bruntrup & R. K. Tacelli (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 21--38.
Arguments for the existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1984 - In J. Houston (ed.), Is It Reasonable to Believe in God? Handsel Press. pp. 121 - 133.


Added to PP

48 (#246,042)

6 months
2 (#298,443)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?