Arguments for the existence of God

In J. Houston (ed.), Is it reasonable to believe in God? Edinburgh: Handsel Press. pp. 121 - 133 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In an inductive argument data increase the probability of a hypothesis insofar as the hypothesis makes probable the data, the data are otherwise not likely to occur, and the hypothesis is simple. The cosmological argument from the existence of the universe, the teleological argument from its conformity to natural law, and other arguments from more detailed features of the universe each increase the probability that there is a God. I thus summarize in a simple form the main points of my book The Existence of God

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Swinburne should have concluded.Charles E. Gutenson - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (3):243-247.
The existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Reply to Grünbaum.Richard Swinburne - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):481-485.
Does God's existence need proof?Richard Messer - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
7 (#1,360,984)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references