Justice after War

Ethics and International Affairs 16 (1):43-56 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sadly, there are few restraints on the endings of wars. There has never been an international treaty to regulate war's final phase, and there are sharp disagreements regarding the nature of a just peace treaty. There are, by contrast, restraints aplenty on starting wars, and on conduct during war. These restraints include: political pressure from allies and enemies; the logistics of raising and deploying force; the United Nations, its Charter and Security Council; and international laws like the Hague and Geneva Conventions. Indeed, in just war theory—which frames moral principles to regulate wartime actions—there is a robust set of rules for resorting to war (jus ad bellum) and for conduct during war (jus in bello) but not for the termination phase of war.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The contingent morality of war: establishing a diachronic model of jus ad bellum.Marcus Schulzke - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (3):264-284.
The Just War Framework.Helen Frowe - 2017 - In Helen Frowe & Seth Lazar (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Ethics in War. New York, NY, USA: pp. 41-58.
Drone Warfare and Just War Theory.Harry van der Linden - 2015 - In Marjorie Cohn (ed.), Drones and Targeted Killing. Northampton, Mass.: Olive Branch Press, Interlink Books. pp. 169-194.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Autonomous Weapons and Just War Theory.Mansi Rathour - 2023 - International Philosophical Quarterly 63 (1):57-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
92 (#190,429)

6 months
13 (#220,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Orend
University of Waterloo