Proportionality and the lives of combatants: a reply to Arthur Ripstein

Jurisprudence:1-10 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I. There is a deep tension in the laws of war. The laws that regulate the resort to war (jus ad bellum) are independent from the laws that regulate conduct in war (jus in bello). This implies that...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reclaiming Proportionality: A Reply to Arthur Ripstein.George Letsas - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (1):24-31.
Response: Limiting Defensive Rights.Seth Lazar - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (1):19-23.
Reply to Ripstein.Jan Narveson - 1990 - Dialogue 29 (2):299-.
Reclaiming Proportionality.Arthur Ripstein - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (3).
Reclaiming Proportionality.Arthur Ripstein - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (1):1-18.
Replies.Arthur Ripstein - forthcoming - Jurisprudence:1-10.
Reply to Flikschuh and Pavlakos.Arthur Ripstein - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (2):317-324.
Arthur Ripstein.Arthur Ripstein - 1999 - Legal Theory 5 (3):235-263.
Force and freedom: Kant's legal and political philosophy.Arthur Ripstein - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Proportionality in international law.Michael A. Newton - 2014 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Edited by Larry May.
Harming Civilians and the Associative Duties of Soldiers.Sara Van Goozen - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (3):584-600.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-21

Downloads
2 (#1,801,846)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references