Authors
Jonathan Opie
University of Adelaide
Abstract
One of the principal tasks Dennett sets himself in Consciousness Explained is to demolish the Cartesian theater model of phenomenal consciousness, which in its contemporary garb takes the form of Cartesian materialism: the idea that conscious experience is a process of presentation realized in the physical materials of the brain. The now standard response to Dennett is that, in focusing on Cartesian materialism, he attacks an impossibly naive account of consciousness held by no one currently working in cognitive science or the philosophy of mind. Our response is quite different. We believe that, once properly formulated, Cartesian materialism is no straw man. Rather, it is an attractive hypothesis about the relationship between the computational architecture of the brain and phenomenal consciousness, and hence one that is worthy of further exploration. Consequently, our primary aim in this paper is to defend Cartesian materialism from Dennett’s assault. We do this by showing that Dennett’s argument against this position is founded on an implicit assumption (about the relationship between phenomenal experience and information coding in the brain), which while valid in the context of classical cognitive science, is not forced on connectionism
Keywords Cartesianism  Consciousness  Materialism  Metaphysics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.2307/2653563
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
What is It Like to Be a Bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.

View all 67 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Putting Content Into a Vehicle Theory of Consciousness.Gerard O'Brien & Jonathan Opie - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):175-196.
The Epistemology of Geometry I: The Problem of Exactness.Anne Newstead & Franklin James - 2010 - Proceedings of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science 2009.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dennett's Mind.Michael Lockwood - 1993 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 36 (1-2):59-72.
The Modal Status of Materialism.Joseph Levine & Kelly Trogdon - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (3):351 - 362.
Sensory States, Consciousness, and the Cartesian Assumption.Gregg Caruso - 2005 - In Nathan Smith and Jason Taylor (ed.), Descartes and Cartesianism. Cambridge Scholars Press.
Dennett on the Split-Brain.Roland Puccetti - 1993 - Psycoloquy 4 (52).
Calling in the Cartesian Loans.Daniel C. Dennett - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):661-661.
Toward a Distributed Computation Model of Extended Cognition.Thomas W. Polger - 2010 - APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 10 (1):16-20.
Consciousness.Rocco J. Gennaro - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
371 ( #27,924 of 2,518,244 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,244 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes