Has the Theory of Evolution any Relevance to Philosophy?

Ratio (Misc.) 29 (1):16 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Evolution of Relevance.Thomas C. Scott-Phillips - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (4):583-601.
Peculiarities in Mind; Or, on the Absence of Darwin.Tanya de Villiers-Botha - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):282-302.
Evolution: the triumph of an idea.Carl Zimmer - 2001 - New York: HarperPerennial.
The Irrelevance of Relevance.David Botting - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (1):1-21.
Fit and diversity: Explaining adaptive evolution.Denis M. Walsh - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (2):280-301.
Different Kinds of Evolution.J. Arthur Thomson - 1926 - Philosophy 1 (1):50-54.
Is it True that ‘Evolution Is a Theory, Not a Fact’?Todd R. Long - 2007 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):89-108.
Meaning and relevance.Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan Sperber.
Evolutionary thought in America.Stow Persons - 1950 - [Hamden, Conn.]: Archon Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anthony O'hear
University of Buckingham

Citations of this work

Natural selection vs trial and error elimination.Brian S. Baigrie - 1989 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3 (2):157 – 172.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references