The New Hume Debate [Book Review]

Philosophy 77 (1):125-141 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The New Hume Debate.Rupert Read & Kenneth A. Richman - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (299):125-129.
The New Hume Debate.Rupert J. Read & Kenneth A. Richman (eds.) - 2000 - New York: Routledge.
The New Hume Debate. [REVIEW]Corliss G. Swain - 2002 - Hume Studies 28 (1):157-160.
The New Hume Debate, Edited By Rupert Read, Kenneth Richman. [REVIEW]Paul Russell - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (1):132-134.
Hume on causality: projectivist and realist?Edward Craig - 2000 - In Rupert J. Read & Kenneth A. Richman (eds.), The New Hume Debate. New York: Routledge. pp. 113-121.
Hume's causal realism: Recovering a traditional interpretation.John P. Wright - 2000 - In Rupert J. Read & Kenneth A. Richman (eds.), The New Hume Debate. New York: Routledge. pp. 88--99.
Sceptical doubts concerning Hume's causal realism.Martin Bell - 2000 - In Rupert J. Read & Kenneth A. Richman (eds.), The New Hume Debate. New York: Routledge. pp. 122--37.
Is Hume a causal realist?P. J. E. Kail - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (3):509 – 520.
Causality and Hume’s foundational project.Miren Boehm - 2019 - In Angela Michelle Coventry & Alex Sager (eds.), _The Humean Mind_. New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references