Improper self-reference in classical logic and the prediction paradox

Logique Et Analyse 10 (2):167-172 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2273020

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Improper Self-Reference in Classical Logic and the Prediction Paradox.M. J. O'carroll - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (2):422-423.
Review: M. J. O'Carroll, Improper Self-Reference in Classical Logic and the Prediction Paradox; M. J. O'Carroll, A Three-Valued, Non-Levelled Logic Consistent for all Self-Reference. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (2):422-423.
O'Carroll M. J.. Improper self-reference in classical logic and the prediction paradox. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 10 , pp. 167–172.O'Carroll M. J.. A three-valued, non-levelled logic consistent for all self-reference. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 10 , pp. 173–178. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (2):422-423.
The Significance of Yablo's Paradox without Self-Reference.Thomas Forster - 2004 - Logique Et Analyse 47.
Prediction paradox revisited.S. Guiasu - 1987 - Logique Et Analyse 30 (17):147-154.
``The Examination Paradox and Formal Prediction".Jorge Bosch - 1972 - Logique Et Analyse 15:505-525.
M. J. Poliferno. Decision algorithms for some functional calculi with modality. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 4 , pp. 138–153. - M. J. Poliferno. Correction to a paper on modal logic. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 7 , pp. 32–33. [REVIEW]A. Bayart - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (2):244-245.
Review: M. J. Cresswell, Logique et Analyse. [REVIEW]G. F. Schumm - 1973 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (2):328-329.
M. J. Cresswell. The completeness of S0.5. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 9 , pp. 263–266. - Richard Routley. The decidability and semantical incompleteness of Lemmon's system S0.5. Logique et analyse, vol. 11 , pp. 413–421. - M. J. Cresswell. Note on the interpretation of SO.5. Logique et analyse, vol. 13 , pp. 376–378. - M. K. Rennie. Remark on Cresswell on S0.5. Logique et analyse, vol. 14 , pp. 757–758. [REVIEW]G. F. Schumm - 1973 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (2):328-329.
A three-valued, non-levelled logic consistent for all self-reference.M. J. O'Carroll - 1967 - Logique Et Analyse 10:173-178.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-11

Downloads
13 (#1,043,138)

6 months
6 (#700,858)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On paradoxes and a surprise exam.Richard L. Kirkham - 1991 - Philosophia 21 (1-2):31-51.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references