A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities

Abstract

Regulation is nothing without enforcement. This particularly holds for the dynamic field of emerging technologies. Hence, this article has two ambitions. First, it explains how the EU´s new Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) will be implemented and enforced by various institutional bodies, thus clarifying the governance framework of the AIA. Second, it proposes a normative model of governance, providing recommendations to ensure uniform and coordinated execution of the AIA and the fulfilment of the legislation. Taken together, the article explores how the AIA may be implemented by national and EU institutional bodies, encompassing longstanding bodies, such as the European Commission, and those newly established under the AIA, such as the AI Office. It investigates their roles across supranational and national levels, emphasizing how EU regulations influence institutional structures and operations. These regulations may not only directly dictate the structural design of institutions but also indirectly request administrative capacities needed to enforce the AIA.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Corporate governance and firm performance of listed Indian companies.Premananda Sethi, Tarak Nath Sahu & Sudarshan Maity - 2023 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 17 (5):573-588.
Are East Asian Companies Benefiting from Western Board Practices?John Nowland - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 79 (1-2):133 - 150.
Board of director effectiveness committees.Michael L. McIntyre & Steven A. Murphy - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (4):461-472.
European Governance and System Integration.Beate Kohler-Koch - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:2-9.
Developing a federal policy on research misconduct.Sybil Francis - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):261-272.
Corporate governance and board effectiveness 2.Richard Leblanc - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (2):106-112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-08

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

P. M. S. Hacker
Oxford University
Claudio Novelli
University of Bologna
Jessica Morley
Oxford University
1 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references