Vivarium 53 (2-4):353-371 (2015)

Authors
Calvin Normore
University of California, Los Angeles
Abstract
_ Source: _Volume 53, Issue 2-4, pp 353 - 371 While agreeing with Professor D’Ors’ thesis that the notion of logical consequence cannot be exhaustively characterized, I depart from Professor d’Ors’ conclusion that the very notion of good consequence is primitive and can only be identified with the set of acceptable rules of inference, and from his conviction that modal notions such as necessity and impossibility are equivocal and gain such clarity as they have by their interaction with rules of inference. Inspired by this picture, Professor d’Ors undertook an examination of a number of medieval attempts to analyze the notion of consequence and tried to show how certain developments in the medieval history of logic made sense in the light of debate over such analyses. This paper examines a small fragment of Professor d’Ors programme and its relation to some aspects of Jean Buridan’s account of the consequence relation
Keywords consequentia   modal notions   John Buridan
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15685349-12341304
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What The Tortoise Said To Achilles.Lewis Carroll - 1895 - Mind 104 (416):691-693.
Dimensions of Truth.Hans G. Herzberger - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (4):535 - 556.
Ex Impossibili Quodlibet Sequitur.Angel D'ors - 1998 - Medioevo 24:177-218.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Medieval Theories of Consequence.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2012 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:1-21.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Formal Reconstruction of Buridan's Modal Syllogism.Spencer Johnston - 2015 - History and Philosophy of Logic 36 (1):2-17.
The Medieval Theory of Consequence.Stephen Read - 2012 - Synthese 187 (3):899-912.
Ockham and Buridan on the Ampliation of Modal Propositions.Spencer Johnston - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (2):234-255.
Consequence Relations and Admissible Rules.Rosalie Iemhoff - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (3):327-348.
Multiple Conclusions.Greg Restall - 2005 - In Petr Hájek, Luis Valdés-Villanueva & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. College Publications.
On a Fallacy Attributed to Tarski.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 1998 - History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):227-234.
Ray on Tarski on Logical Consequence.William H. Hanson - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (6):605-616.
John Buridan.Gyula Klima - 2008 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-10-06

Total views
104 ( #112,787 of 2,507,901 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,107 of 2,507,901 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes