Scotus, modality, instants of nature and the contingency of the present

In Ludger Honnefelder, Rega Wood & Mechthild Dreyer (eds.), John Duns Scotus: metaphysics and ethics. New York: E.J. Brill. pp. 161--174 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saving Contingency: On Ockham’s Objection to Duns Scotus.Pascal Massie - 2004 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):333-350.
Recent work on the philosophy of duns scotus.Richard Cross - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (8):667-675.
Fatalism and the Metaphysics of Contingency.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2015 - In Steven M. Cahn & Maureen Eckert (eds.), Freedom and the Self: Essays on the Philosophy of David Foster Wallace. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 57-92.
Actuality and the amodal perspective.Olla Solomyak - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):15-40.
Duns Scotus' Modal Theory.Calvin G. Normore - 2003 - In Thomas Williams (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge University Press. pp. 129-160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
4 (#1,621,857)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Calvin Normore
University of California, Los Angeles

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references