Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (5-6):623-644 (2014)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Many people want to hold that some theoretical virtues—simplicity, elegance, familiarity or others—are only pragmatic virtues. That is, these features do not give us any more reason to think a theory is true, or close to true, but they justify choosing one theoretical option over another because they are desirable for some other, practical purpose. Using pragmatic virtues in theory choice apparently brings with it a dilemma: if we are deciding what to accept on the basis of considerations that are not truth-conducive, it looks like we should either refrain from believing what we accept, and adopt some sort of instrumentalist attitude to the theories we cherish; or alternatively, we stand charged with engaging in theoretical irrationality in our belief formation. This paper discusses the appropriate response to this dilemma
|
Keywords | theoretical virtues instrumentalism theory choice theoretical rationality |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1080/0020174x.2014.967806 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1977 - In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago Press. pp. 320--39.
Evidential Symmetry and Mushy Credence.Roger White - 2009 - In T. Szabo Gendler & J. Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 161-186.
View all 7 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Permissivism, Underdetermination, and Evidence.Elizabeth Jackson & Margaret Greta Turnbull - forthcoming - In Clayton Littlejohn & Maria Lasonen-Aarnio (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Evidence. New York: Routledge. pp. 1-13.
Epistemic Paternalism, Epistemic Permissivism, and Standpoint Epistemology.Elizabeth Jackson - 2020 - In Amiel Bernal & Guy Axtell (eds.), Epistemic Paternalism Reconsidered: Conceptions, Justifications, and Implications. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. pp. 201-215.
Similar books and articles
Josef Pieper: Explorations in the Thought of a Philosopher of Virtue.Gilbert Meilaender & Gilbert Meilander - 1983 - Journal of Religious Ethics 11 (1):114 - 134.
Positivism and the Pragmatic Theory of Observation.Thomas Oberdan - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:25 - 37.
The Pragmatic Character of Explanation.Peter Achinstein - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:275 - 292.
Is Fertility Virtuous in its Own Right?Daniel Nolan - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):265-282.
Virtue Ethics as a Resource in Business.Robert Audi - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):273-291.
Beyond the Bottom Line: The Theoretical Goals of Moral Theorizing.Jason Brennan - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (2):277-296.
Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth.Cheryl J. Misak - 1991 - Oxford University Press.
Intellectual Virtues in Environmental Virtue Ethics.Sue P. Stafford - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (4):339-352.
The Logic of Pragmatic Truth.Newton C. A. Da Costa, Otávio Bueno & Steven French - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (6):603-620.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-11-06
Total views
103 ( #112,145 of 2,498,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,910 of 2,498,296 )
2014-11-06
Total views
103 ( #112,145 of 2,498,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,910 of 2,498,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads