- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
So why does animal experimentation matter? Review of Ellen Frankel Paul and Jeffrey Paul, eds. 2001. Why animal experimentation matters: The use of animals in medical research
American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):1 – 2 (2003)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Rational engagement, emotional response and the prospects for progress in animal use ‘debates’.Nathan Nobis - 2013
A Rational Defense of Animal Experimentation.Nathan Nobis - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):49-62.
The wild animal as a research animal.Jac A. A. Swart - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):181-197.
Without a tear: our tragic relationship with animals.Mark H. Bernstein - 2004 - Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Rowlands, Rawlsian Justice and Animal Experimentation.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):569-587.
Util-izing animals.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
65 (#248,709)
6 months
6 (#510,793)
2009-01-28
Downloads
65 (#248,709)
6 months
6 (#510,793)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Human and animal subjects of research: The moral significance of respect versus welfare.Rebecca L. Walker - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):305-331.
Interests and Harms in Primate Research.Nathan Nobis - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):27-29.
References found in this work
Animal models in biomedical research: Some epistemological worries.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1993 - Public Affairs Quarterly 7 (2):113-130.
Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 4 (1):115-121.
THE INTACT SYSTEMS ARGUMENT: Problems with the Standard Defense of Animal Experimentation.Niall Shanks - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):323-333.
THE INTACT SYSTEMS ARGUMENT: Problems with the Standard Defense of Animal Experimentation.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):323-333.
Two models of models in biomedical research.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):141-160.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-pjbg5 uwo