THE INTACT SYSTEMS ARGUMENT: Problems with the Standard Defense of Animal Experimentation

Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):323-333 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Util-izing animals.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
Util‐izing Animals.Niall Shanks Hugh Lafollette - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
A Rational Defense of Animal Experimentation.Nathan Nobis - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):49-62.
Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks, Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.Joseph Mahon - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):130-131.
Animal experimentation.Alastair Norcross - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Review. Brute science: dilemmas of animal experimentation. Hugh LaFollette, Niall Shanks.Mark Parascandola - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):621-624.
Two models of models in biomedical research.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):141-160.
The Origin of Speciesism.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (275):41-.
Accept No Substitutes: The Ethics of Alternatives.Joel Marks - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (s1):S16-S18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
62 (#254,871)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh LaFollette
University of South Florida

References found in this work

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.

View all 7 references / Add more references