Critical scientific realism

New York: Oxford University Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book comes to the rescue of scientific realism, showing that reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated. Philosophical realism holds that the aim of a particular discourse is to make true statements about its subject matter. Ilkka Niiniluoto surveys different kinds of realism in various areas of philosophy and then sets out his own critical realist philosophy of science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Datta, Frauley and Pearce.Mervyn Hartwig - 2010 - Journal of Critical Realism 9 (2):248-254.
Fictions, inference and realism.Mauricio Suárez - 2010 - In John Woods (ed.), Fictions and Models: New Essays. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.
Critical Notices.Anjan Chakravartty - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):227-229.
Modest Realism.William Newton-Smith - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:179 - 189.
How to be realistic about folk psychology.George Graham & Terence Horgan - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):69-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
497 (#37,895)

6 months
16 (#157,055)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ilkka Niiniluoto
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Truth-Seeking by Abduction.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2018 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
What is scientific progress?Alexander Bird - 2007 - Noûs 41 (1):64–89.
Scientific Realism.Anjan Chakravartty - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scientific Realism.Richard Boyd - 1984 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 21 (1&2):767-791.

View all 159 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references