Intending Recalcitrant Social Ends

Erkenntnis 87 (2):477-498 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One can intend the actions of others, even when one believes such actions are not under one’s control. Call the objects of intentions “ends”; the ends that consist of other people’s actions “social”; and the ends that consist of things one believes one cannot control “recalcitrant”. The thesis, then, is that one can intend recalcitrant social ends. I present a positive argument in favor of this idea, and then argue against some purported conditions on the possible content of intentions that would rule out the possibility of intending such ends. The positive argument is the following: intentions are realized by a certain cluster of dispositions. One can come to be so disposed towards recalcitrant social ends. So one can come to be disposed toward such ends in the manner that realizes an intention. So one can intend recalcitrant social ends. The conditions against which I argue are known in the literature as the Own Action Condition, the Control Condition, and the Settle Condition. I present cases where, intuitively, agents genuinely intend ends that would be ruled out by these conditions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can I Only Intend My Own Actions?Luca Ferrero - 2013 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford studies in agency and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. (1) 70-94.
Praxis and the ends of action in Suárez.David Gonzalez Ginocchio - 2017 - Anuario Filosófico 50 (2):371-396.
Animals in the Kingdom of Ends.Heather M. Kendrick - 2010 - Between the Species 13 (10):2.
Ends.Mark LeBar - 2004 - Social Theory and Practice 30 (4):507-533.
Caring, final ends and sports.William J. Morgan - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):7 – 21.
Do Theodicists Mean What They Say?Clement Dore - 1974 - Philosophy 49 (190):357 - 374.
Defending double effect.Alison Hills - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (2):133-152.
Requirements of intention in light of belief.Carlos Núñez - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2471-2492.
An Anatomy of Values. [REVIEW]S. C. A. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):352-352.
The Kingdom of Ends.Susan Robbins - 1993 - Dissertation, Temple University
How is Recalcitrant Emotion Possible?Hagit Benbaji - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (3):577-599.
Ends and Persons: A Transcendental Argument.David DeMatteo - forthcoming - Episteme: An Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy.
The Division of Action in Thomas Aquinas. Flannery - 2009 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (3):421-440.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-26

Downloads
47 (#335,478)

6 months
9 (#299,476)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carlos Núñez
University of Oxford

References found in this work

Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Intention, plans, and practical reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.

View all 41 references / Add more references