On the Reality of the Continuum Discussion Note: A Reply to Ormell, ‘Russell's Moment of Candour’, Philosophy

Philosophy 83 (1):117-127 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In a recent article, Christopher Ormell argues against the traditional mathematical view that the real numbers form an uncountably infinite set. He rejects the conclusion of Cantor’s diagonal argument for the higher, non-denumerable infinity of the real numbers. He does so on the basis that the classical conception of a real number is mys- terious, ineffable, and epistemically suspect. Instead, he urges that mathematics should admit only ‘well-defined’ real numbers as proper objects of study. In practice, this means excluding as inadmissible all those real numbers whose decimal expansions cannot be calculated in as much detail as one would like by some rule. We argue against Ormell that the classical realist account of the continuum has explanatory power in mathematics and should be accepted, much in the same way that "dark matter" is posited by physicists to explain observations in cosmology. In effect, the indefinable real numbers are like the "dark matter" of real analysis

Similar books and articles

Compassion, Not Belief. [REVIEW]Anne Newstead - 2005 - Quadrant 49 (6):88-89.
The Epistemology of Geometry I: the Problem of Exactness.Anne Newstead & Franklin James - 2010 - Proceedings of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science 2009.
Indispensability Without Platonism.Anne Newstead & James Franklin - 2012 - In Alexander Bird, Brian Ellis & Howard Sankey (eds.), Properties, Powers, and Structures: Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 81-97.
Aristotle as A-Theorist: Overcoming the Myth of Passage.Jacqueline Marina & Franklin Mason - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):169-192.
Species in Aristotle.James Franklin - 1989 - Philosophy 64 (247):107 - 108.
Ideology and School Mathamatics: Reply to C. P. Ormell.W. G. M. Elliott - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 3 (1):55-64.
Ideology and school mathamatics: Reply to C. P. Ormell.W. G. M. Elliott - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 3 (1):55–64.


Added to PP

656 (#24,604)

6 months
95 (#42,058)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anne Newstead
Swinburne University of Technology