Climax: Biology and Ethics in Environmental Restoration

Environmental Ethics 41 (4):347-359 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Justifications for the environmental restoration of the Pumalín National Park, originally known as Pumalín Nature Sanctuary, in Chile can be analyzed from a philosophical and ethical point of view. The environmental stage to which the park should be restored is defined as a moral choice, rather than an ecological one, that is based on “climax” as an a priori value that supports and guides the main restoration actions carried out in the park. This climax is a pre-settling or pre-colonization condition. Defined philosophically, climax is both an ethical and political value. For these actions, the ecosystem’s health can be treated the same as that of a human’s health: each society defines the criteria and the acme of health, as well as the valid efforts to restore it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Politics of Ecological Restoration.Andrew Light & Eric S. Higgs - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):227-247.
Restitutive Restoration.John Basl - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (2):135-147.
Ecological Restorations as Practices of Moral Repair.Ben Almassi - 2017 - Ethics and the Environment 22 (1):19-40.
Ecological restoration and environmental ethics.Mark Cowell - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):19-32.
Ecological Restoration and Environmental Ethics.Mark Cowell - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):19-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-06

Downloads
7 (#1,377,350)

6 months
2 (#1,202,576)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references