Reconsidering scarce drug rationing: implications for clinical research

Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e16-e16 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hospital systems commonly face the challenge of determining just ways to allocate scarce drugs during national shortages. There is no standardised approach of how this should be instituted, but principles of distributive justice are commonly used so that patients who are most likely to benefit from the drug receive it. As a result, clinical indications, in which the evidence for the drug is assumed to be established, are often prioritised over research use. In this manuscript, we present a case of a phase II investigational trial of intravenous thiamine for delirium prevention in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation to emphasise several shortcomings in the overarching prioritisation of clinical over research uses of scarce drugs. Specifically, we present the following considerations: clinical use may not have stronger evidence than research use; a strong scientific rationale for research use may outweigh the claim for clinical indications in which there is weak evidence; treatment within the context of a clinical trial may be the standard of care; and research use may not only benefit patients receiving the treatment but also offers the prospect of improving future clinical care. In summary, we argue against allocation schemes that prohibit all research uses of scarce drugs and instead recommend that allocation schemes include a balanced approach that weighs risks and benefits of access to scarce drugs irrespective of the research versus clinical use designation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What we worry about when we worry about the ethics of clinical research.David Wendler - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):161-180.
Clinical research: up from 'clinical epidemiology'.Olli S. Miettinen, Lucas M. Bachmann & Johann Steurer - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1208-1213.
What clinical pharmacology means to us.S. Malhotra & N. Shafiq - 2006 - Mens Sana Monographs 4 (1):184.
Why High Drug Pricing Is A Problem for Research Ethics.Spencer Phillips Hey - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (1):29-35.
Community equipoise and the architecture of clinical research.Jason H. T. Karlawish & John Lantos - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (4):385-.
Community Equipoise and the Architecture of Clinical Research.Jason H. T. Karlawish & John Lantos - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (4):385-396.
A clinical trials manual from the Duke Clinical Research Institute: lessons from a horse named Jim.Margaret B. Liu - 2010 - Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Kate Davis & Margaret B. Liu.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-28

Downloads
19 (#822,759)

6 months
8 (#414,134)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas MacKay
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations