Purity is linked to cooperation but not necessarily through self-control

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e311 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Fitouchi et al. claim that seemingly victimless pleasures and nonproductive activities are moralized because they alter self-control. Their account predicts that: (1) victimless excesses are negatively moralized because they diminish self-control, and (2) restrained behaviors are positively moralized because they enhance self-control. Several examples run contrary to these predictions and call into question the general relationship between self-control and cooperation.

Similar books and articles

Nietzsche: Through the Lens of Purity.Robbie Duschinsky - 2011 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 41 (1):50-64.
Learning to cooperate: Reciprocity and self-control.Peter Danielson - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):256-257.
Purity as an ideal of proof.Michael Detlefsen - 2008 - In Paolo Mancosu (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford University Press. pp. 179-197.
Against Purity: Living Ethically in Compromised Times.Alexis Shotwell - 2016 - Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
Purity of Methods.Michael Detlefsen & Andrew Arana - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11.
Against Purity.Jonathan Barker - 2023 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9.
Purity Balls.Nicole B. Doolen - 2016 - Stance 9 (1):73-83.
Purity in Morals.Frances Myrna - 1983 - The Monist 66 (2):283-297.
Technology and Human Existence.Edmund Byrne - 1979 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):55-69.


Added to PP

242 (#80,036)

6 months
113 (#31,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Samuel Murray
Providence College
Santiago Amaya
University of the Andes

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations