The apodictic method and the dialogue between theology and science (I)

Journal of Philosophical Economics Volume XIV Issue-2 (Articles) (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many today’s scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast to the widespread opinion, the authors of this paper consider that historically scientific reasoning and religious belief joined hands in their effort to investigate and understand reality. In fact, the current divorce between science and religion is nothing else than the final outcome of a gradual long-term, and deliberately assumed process of science secularization of science. However, especially during the last decades, we have all been equally confronted with the advance of a new concern over the fact that contemporary scientists have been approaching an area of investigation that had been usually addressed by the theological thought. This recent development has generated an emerging new field of investigation of Science and Religion within modern scientific epistemology.Against this background, the purpose of this paper is three-fold: firstly, to briefly emphasize that one of the defining dimensions of the dialogue between science and religion is given by the discontinuity, in which, the knowledge acquired through scientific reasoning is placed in relation to the divinely revealed knowledge; secondly, to argue that another defining dimension of the dialogue consists in the hierarchical harmony mediating the encounter between the two, thus transgressing the discontinuity and making the dialogue between theology and science possible and viable; and thirdly, to advocate the idea that the apodictic method (based on antinomic logic) can successfully structure such a dialogue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Difference and Unity of Humanities and Social Science.Xinyan Wang - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 67:59-62.
History in the humanities and social sciences.Richard Bourke & Quentin Skinner (eds.) - 2023 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scientific method in brief.Hugh G. Gauch - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Research methods in the Humanities.A. Afanasyev - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 2 (22):253-258.
Explanation and Understanding in the History of Philosophy and Ricoeur’s Theory.Sanja Ivic - 2008 - Crossroads: an interdisciplinary journal for the study of history, philosophy, religion and classics 3 (1):26-34.
Philosophical Relationship of Humanities and Technology.Alireza Mansouri & Ali Paya - 2019 - Persian Journal for the Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities 25 (99):19-23.
Naturalistic hermeneutics.Chrysostomos Mantzavinos - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-31

Downloads
10 (#1,186,283)

6 months
7 (#419,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references