Philosophical Studies 174 (7):1871-1883 (2017)

Ryan Muldoon
State University of New York, Buffalo
This paper explores the space of possibilities for public justification in morally diverse communities. Moral diversity is far more consequential than is typically appreciated, and as a result, we need to think more carefully about how our standard tools function in such environments. I argue that because of this diversity, public justification can be divorced from any claim of determinateness. Instead, we should focus our attention on procedures—in particular, what Rawls called cases of pure procedural justice. I use a modified form of the procedure “I cut, you choose” to demonstrate how perspectival diversity can make what looks like a simple procedure quite complex in practice. I use this to reframe disputes between classical liberal and contemporary liberal approaches to questions of public morality, arguing that classically liberal procedures, such as a reliance on the harm principle, can generate rather illiberal-looking outcomes when used in a morally diverse community. A seemingly less-principled approach, which simply balances burdens, appears to generate outcomes that look closer to what we would expect from classical liberalism. However, since both approaches are based on pure procedures that we can justify without reference to outcomes, it remains indeterminate which we ought to choose.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-016-0825-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What’s New in the New Ideology Critique?Kirun Sankaran - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (5):1441-1462.
In Public Reason, Diversity Trumps Coherence.Kevin Vallier & Ryan Muldoon - 2021 - Journal of Political Philosophy 29 (2):211-230.
Diversity, Toleration and Recent Social Contract Theory.James W. Boettcher - 2019 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (5):539-554.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Prankster's Ethics.Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):45–52.
Montesquieu's Observant Liberalism.Louisa Clark Lund - 1999 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Against the Asymmetric Convergence Model of Public Justification.James W. Boettcher - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1):191-208.
Norms of Epistemic Diversity.Miriam Solomon - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):23-36.


Added to PP index

Total views
70 ( #162,717 of 2,499,765 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,292 of 2,499,765 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes