Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (1):1-21 (2021)

Alexander McKeown
University of Bristol
Sophie Louise Walker
King's College London
Data platforms represent a new paradigm for carrying out health research. In the platform model, datasets are pooled for remote access and analysis, so novel insights for developing better stratified and/or personalised medicine approaches can be derived from their integration. If the integration of diverse datasets enables development of more accurate risk indicators, prognostic factors, or better treatments and interventions, this obviates the need for the sharing and reuse of data; and a platform-based approach is an appropriate model for facilitating this. Platform-based approaches thus require new thinking about consent. Here we defend an approach to meeting this challenge within the data platform model, grounded in: the notion of ‘reasonable expectations’ for the reuse of data; Waldron’s account of ‘integrity’ as a heuristic for managing disagreement about the ethical permissibility of the approach; and the element of the social contract that emphasises the importance of public engagement in embedding new norms of research consistent with changing technological realities. While a social contract approach may sound appealing, however, it is incoherent in the context at hand. We defend a way forward guided by that part of the social contract which requires public approval for the proposal and argue that we have moral reasons to endorse a wider presumption of data reuse. However, we show that the relationship in question is not recognisably contractual and that the social contract approach is therefore misleading in this context. We conclude stating four requirements on which the legitimacy of our proposal rests.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-021-00282-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice as Fairness.John Rawls - 1958 - Philosophical Review 67 (2):164-194.
The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions.Allen Buchanan & Robert O. Keohane - 2006 - Ethics and International Affairs 20 (4):405-437.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Precision Medicine, Data, and the Anthropology of Social Status.Hugh Desmond - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (4):80-83.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Clinical Trial Data Sharing Platforms Can Advance the Study of Biomarkers.Rebecca Li & Ida Sim - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (3):369-373.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #852,053 of 2,506,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,828 of 2,506,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes