Wittgenstein und Fodor: Die hinweisende Definition und ihre Voraussetzung

In Danièle Moyal-Sharrock, Volker Munz & Annalisa Coliva (eds.), Mind, Language and Action: Proceedings of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 169-180 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Platonische Dialektik: Der Weg und das Ziel.Thomas Alexander Szlezák - 2005 - Perspektiven der Philosophie 31 (1):289-319.
Plato, Wittgenstein and the definition of games.Catherine Rowett - 2013 - In Luigi Perissinotto & Begoña Ramón Cámara (eds.), Wittgenstein and Plato: connections, comparisons and contrasts. Palgrave. pp. 196-219.
Wittgenstein on ostensive definition.P. M. S. Hacker - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):267 – 287.
Why Fodor can't have it both ways.Michael Devitt - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell. pp. 95--118.
‘Propositions About Blue’ – Wittgenstein on the Concept of Colour.Gabriele M. Mras - 2014 - In Frederik Gierlinger & Štefan Joško Riegelnik (eds.), Wittgenstein on Colour. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 45-56.
Granny's campaign for safe science.Daniel C. Dennett - 1990 - In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
17 (#742,076)

6 months
5 (#246,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gabriele M. Mras
University of Economics, Vienna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references