Attack, disapproval, or withdrawal? The role of honour in anger and shame responses to being insulted

Cognition and Emotion 22 (8):1471-1498 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Insults elicit intense emotion. This study tests the hypothesis that one's social image, which is especially salient in honour cultures, influences the way in which one reacts to an insult. Seventy-seven honour-oriented and 72 non-honour oriented participants answered questions about a recent insult episode. Participants experienced both anger and shame in reaction to the insult. However, these emotions resulted in different behaviours. Anger led to verbal attack (i.e., criticising, insulting in return) among all participants. This relationship was explained by participants’ motivation to punish the wrongdoer. Shame, on the other hand, was moderated by honour. Shame led to verbal disapproval of the wrongdoers behaviour, but only among the honour-oriented participants. This relationship was explained by these participants’ motivation to protect their social image. By contrast, shame led to withdrawal among non-honour-oriented participants.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,716

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Putting the shameful body to death: some critiques and a way forward in the soteriology of shame.Christoph Ochs & Simon Cozens - 2019 - Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 36 (4):233-245.
Shame and Contempt in Kant's Moral Theory.Krista K. Thomason - 2013 - Kantian Review 18 (2):221-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-26

Downloads
58 (#409,531)

6 months
10 (#391,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?