The ethics and politics of the caged layer hen debate in new zealand

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):495-514 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Changes in attitudes toward animal welfare, with a greater emphasis on the importance of allowing animals to express normal patterns of behavior has led to an examination of the practice of keeping hens in battery cages. There is widespread scientific consensus that the conditions of confinement and the barren nature of battery cages severely restrict hens’ behavioral repertoire, and are thus detrimental to their welfare. The New Zealand Animal Welfare Act 1999, stipulates that animals must have “the opportunity to display normal patterns of behaviour.” In spite of this provision, the New Zealand government has not acted in phasing out battery cages, arguing instead that there is insufficient evidence that welfare will be improved by a phase-out. There is evidence of strong industry pressure on the government, and the use of tactics common in policy considerations where changes are resisted by powerful interests. It is important that policy processes are better managed so that welfare changes are based on both public preferences and scientific knowledge, and ways of doing this are discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Limitations on the Confinement of Food Animals in the United States.Terence J. Centner - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (5):469-486.
Incorporating the Philosophy of Technology into Animal Welfare Assessment.Courtney Lynd Daigle - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (4):633-647.
Minimizing harm in agricultural animal experiments in new zealand.M. C. Morris & S. A. Weaver - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (5):421-437.
Animal care ethics, ANZCCART, and public perceptions of animal use ethics.Fred Gifford - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):249-257.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#486,933)

6 months
9 (#437,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Limitations on the Confinement of Food Animals in the United States.Terence J. Centner - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (5):469-486.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status.David DeGrazia (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references