Autonomy, force and cultural plurality

Res Publica 14 (3):147-168 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Within now prolific debates surrounding the compatibility of feminism and multiculturalism in liberal societies, the need arises for a normative conception of women’s self-determination that does not violate the self-understandings or values of women of different backgrounds and forms of life. With reference to the recent British debate about forced marriage, this article proposes an innovative approach to this problem in terms of the idea of ‘plural autonomy’. While the capacity for autonomy is plural, in the sense of varying across cultures, autonomy in any world-view involves a capacity to ‘endorse’ one’s decisions in certain crucial spheres of life. Non-endorsement, coercion or force occurs if one risks being alienated from the (cultural) goods and relationships that structure one’s capacity to act in the world. This approach counsels more caution than prominent liberal approaches with respect to negotiating the contested boundary between freedom and force in a diverse society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#210,984)

6 months
17 (#203,322)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Autonomy Education Beyond Borders.Danielle Zwarthoed - 2020 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 12 (1):100-120.
A response to Monica Mookherjee.Fariha Thomas - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (3):169-176.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
A theory of justice.John Rawls - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.

View all 53 references / Add more references