Nominal and Clausal Event Predicates

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that not only PPs and adverbs can act as predicates of the event argument of the verb, but certain NPs and certain clauses can, as well. I will give syntactic and semantic arguments that NPs that are cognate objects and clauses of (at least some) nonbridge verbs are optional predicates of the event argument of the verb. With respect to clauses, I will argue that for independent reasons the meaning of both independent and embedded sentences can be construed as event-properties, namely as properties of intentional events

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-15

Downloads
97 (#177,668)

6 months
59 (#79,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Friederike Moltmann
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

Special Quantifiers: Higher-Order Quantification and Nominalization.Friederike Moltmann - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The logical form of action sentences.Donald Davidson - 1967 - In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 81--95.
Barriers.Noam Chomsky - 1986 - MIT Press.
Demonstrative constructions, reference, and truth.Tyler Burge - 1974 - Journal of Philosophy 71 (7):205-223.
Elucidations of meaning.James Higginbotham - 1989 - Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (4):465 - 517.

Add more references