- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Orphan Papers and Ghostwriting: The Case against the ICMJE Criterion of Authorship
Accountability in Research 20 (2): 59-71 (2013)
Abstract
Although popular, I argue that the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) account of authorship is flawed. It inadvertently allows for practices that it was designed to prevent. In addition, it creates a new category of authorless papers—orphan papers. The original World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) criterion is preferable.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Authorless Paper: the ICMJE’s definition of authorship is illogical and unethical.David Shaw - 2011 - British Medical Journal 343 (7831):999.
The Norms of Authorship Credit: Challenging the Definition of Authorship in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.Mohammad Hosseini & Jonathan Lewis - 2020 - Accountability in Research 27 (2):80-98.
Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors.Matko Marušić, Jadranka Božikov, Vedran Katavić, Darko Hren, Marko Kljaković-Gašpić & Ana Marušić - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):493-502.
Scientific authorship and intellectual involvement in the research: Should they coincide?Gert Helgesson - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (2):171-175.
Teaching Authorship and Publication Practices in the Biomedical and Life Sciences.Francis L. Macrina - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):341-354.
Misuse of co-authorship in Medical PhD Theses in Scandinavia: A Questionnaire Survey.Gert Helgesson, Søren Holm, Lone Bredahl, Bjørn Hofmann & Niklas Juth - 2023 - Journal of Academic Ethics 21 (3):393-406.
Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings.B. Pignatelli - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (10):578-581.
Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles.T. Prabhakar Clement - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):345-361.
Guest Authors in An I ranian Journal.Mahsa Ghajarzadeh - 2014 - Developing World Bioethics 14 (1):15-19.
Knowledge and Perceptions of Honorary Authorship among Health Care Researchers: Online Cross-sectional Survey Data from the Middle East.Reema Karasneh, Dania Qutaishat & Mayis Aldughmi - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (3):1-19.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-05-30
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2013-05-30
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication.Mohammad Hosseini, Jonathan Lewis, Hub Zwart & Bert Gordijn - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (3):1-24.
Authorship policies of scientific journals: Table 1.David B. Resnik, Ana M. Tyler, Jennifer R. Black & Grace Kissling - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (3):199-202.
Research funding and authorship: does grant winning count towards authorship credit?Barton Moffatt - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):683-686.
Authorship Issues When Articles are Retracted Due to Research Misconduct and Then Resubmitted.David B. Resnik, Kathy Partin & Taraswi Banerjee - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (4):1-25.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo