Rethinking the Just Intelligence Theory of National Security Intelligence Collection and Analysis: The Principles of Discrimination, Necessity, Proportionality and Reciprocity

Social Epistemology 35 (3):211-231 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, it is argued that the constitutive principles of Just War Theory and the jus ad bellum/jus in bello duality do not transfer all that well to national security intelligence activity...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The case for integrated intelligence.Marcus Anthony - 2008 - World Futures 64 (4):233 – 253.
A Critique of Just War Theory.David Rodger Mellow - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Calgary (Canada)
Automated Influence and the Challenge of Cognitive Security.Sarah Rajtmajer & Daniel Susser - forthcoming - HoTSoS: ACM Symposium on Hot Topics in the Science of Security.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-15

Downloads
18 (#826,353)

6 months
7 (#419,552)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Proportionality in the Morality of War.Thomas Hurka - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1):34-66.
Necessity in Self-Defense and War.Seth Lazar - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 40 (1):3-44.
Just and Unjust Wars.M. Walzer - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (209):415-420.
Proportionality and Self-Defense.Suzanne Uniacke - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.

View all 9 references / Add more references