Revus 22:51-65 (2014)

Abstract
There are two basic views concerning the relationship between constitutional rights and proportionality analysis. The first maintains that there exists a necessary connection between constitutional rights and proportionality, the second argues that the question of whether constitutional rights and proportionality are connected depends on what the framers of the constitution have actually decided, that is, on positive law. The first thesis may be termed ‘necessity thesis’, the second ‘contingency thesis’. According to the necessity thesis, the legitimacy of proportionality analysis is a question of the nature of constitutional rights, according to the contingency thesis, it is a question of interpretation. The article defends the necessity thesis. | A previous version of this article was published in Chinese Yearbook of Constitutional Law, Vol. 2010, 221–235
Keywords human rights   principles theory   proportionality analysis   constitutional rights   necessary connection   dual nature   človekove pravice   teorija načel   presoja sorazmernosti   ustavne pravice   nujna zveza   dvojna narava
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Authentic Interpretation.Timothy Endicott - 2020 - Ratio Juris 33 (1):6-23.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Whatever Works: Proportionality as a Constitutional Doctrine.D. Kyritsis - 2014 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34 (2):395-415.
In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication.Charles-Maxime Panaccio - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (1):109-128.
The Dual Nature of Law.Robert Alexy - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (2):167-182.
Are Constitutional Rights Personal?Linda Ross Meyer - 2000 - Legal Theory 6 (4):405-422.
Personal Rights and Rule-Dependence.Matthew D. Adler - 2000 - Legal Theory 6 (4):337-389.
Proportionality: From the Concept to the Procedure.Artūras Panomariovas & Egidijus Losis - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 120 (2):257-272.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-04-29

Total views
620 ( #13,046 of 2,505,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #24,214 of 2,505,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes